Georgetown University School of Continuing Studies

Doctor of Liberal Studies

The Early Roman Empire: Politics and Society

Course Description:

This course is designed, above all, to introduce the student via PRIMARY SOURCES to the vibrant period of the Early Roman Empire, that is from the ‘founding’ of it by AUGUSTUS up to the early second century, principally, but we will absolutely want to treat certain issues of importance that take us beyond that period, for example the rise and ‘triumph’ of Christianity via the reign of the first Christian emperor, CONSTANTINE.  Of course all will be read within a given and particular historical context for which our SECONDARY SOURCE, The History of Rome, will serve as our guide. We shall trace the political, economic, social, and legal issues associated with the collapse of the Republican government and the efforts of, in particular, the first emperor (Augustus) to address this collapse by instituting various remedies, among them constitutional, social, legal, and religious provisions.  In this regard we shall be looking at matters of change and continuity.

 

As stated earlier, we will explore Rome’s history primarily through the use of primary source materials, that is, through the eyes of contemporaries (or almost) as manifested in their own writing (see above under required texts: primary). These sources permit us to read what the ancients themselves thought and recorded about their existence and about some of the issues we shall be exploring, such as wealth and society, citizenship and government, law and the courts, Romans and aliens, freedom and slavery, pagans and Christians, provincial life and administration. 

 

Not to be forgotten, finally, is that the course becomes an examination of the historiographical methods of our ancient sources. What did they choose to write about? What approach/es did they take? What was the scope of their subject matter? What was their purpose in writing? Who was their target audience? What themes did they stress? How reliable were they? What methods of presentation did they adopt? How rhetorical were they? How dramatic? What difference/es can we detect from among the many varieties of sources we shall be examining, from traditionally historical to biographical to legal to satirical, etc.

Doctor of Liberal Studies News and Highlights