- Handbooks for SCS Faculty
- Internal Resources for SCS Faculty
- Grading: Process & Procedures
- Honor Code: Process & Procedures
- External Resources for SCS Faculty
Questions, please contact:
Academic Affairs & Compliance Office
School of Continuing Studies
640 Massachusetts Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20001
Phone: 202-687-8700 Fax: 202-784-7235
Handbooks for SCS Faculty Members
Georgetown University Faculty Handbook: The Handbook details faculty rights and responsibilities, the University Mission Statement, University governance, campus policies and other benefits.
SCS Teaching Guidebook (AY14-15 coming soon): Whether you are new to teaching at Georgetown and SCS or a seasoned faculty member, this guidebook will serve as a helpful reference when building syllabi, evaluating student progress, and handling academic policies (such as grade appeals and suspected acts of cheating or plagiarism).
SCS Student Handbooks and Academic Calendar: Students may come to you with academic policy questions or questions about add/drop/withdrawal and tuition deadlines. You can refer them to these pages to make sure that they get accurate information.
CNDLS Teaching Handbook: In this booklet, the Center for New Designs in Learning and Scholarship defines student-centered teaching and how to enact it within your curriculum.
Copyright Policy: The Copyright Policy page references the overall and specific Georgetown University policies related to Copyright Basics, Using Copyrighted Resources, and "Obtaining and Giving Permissions." Additionally, the ProQuest
Copyright Law & Graduate Research manual provides helpful guidance. At this time, only theses written by Liberal Studies students are published.
Counseling and Psychiatric Services (CAPS): As Georgetown faculty, you are among the most important individuals in some of the students' lives. They may turn to you when they are struggling and in times of need, or you may be one of the first to notice when they are distressed. There are tips for faculty on how to deal with struggling or distressed students.
Financial Conflicts of Interest Policy: underscores the University’s fundamental expectation that our work will be conducted with objectivity and integrity. The policy seeks to identify potential, actual or apparent financial conflicts of interest and provides processes for disclosure of such conflicts and for eliminating or, when appropriate, managing them. It also acknowledges the special obligation that members of our community whose work is supported by public funds have to protect and maintain the public’s trust.
Syllabus Building Checklist & Guidelines: Every course requires a syllabus. This "Building" document should be used as a checklist for the required information to included. All syllabi must be made available on the Schedule of Classes. Click here for instructions.
Grading: Process & Procedures
- Faculty teaching credit courses must enter all final grades using MyAccess.
- Faculty teaching non-credit courses must enter grades using the Non-Credit Faculty Grading Portal.
Honor Code: Process & Procedures
We encourage faculty to include specific statements about the Honor Code on their course syllabi and to be familiar with the Honor System and process (honorcouncil.georgetown.edu/faculty). Students are bound by the Honor System even if their instructors do not discuss the Honor Code or use turnitin.com to encourage originality and authenticity. Therefore, we recommend that students discuss all questions about plagiarism, impermissible collaboration and appropriate attribution (citing sources) with their course instructors.
A. Reporting a Possible Honor Code Violation
- As a faculty member at Georgetown and in SCS, you must report any and all suspected violations of the Honor Code to the Honor Council at email@example.com as soon as you become aware of the possible violation. Although you may also choose to talk with your Associate Dean about the matter, reporting the incident to the Honor Council is your most important step.
- Shortly after you report the incident, you will be contacted by an Investigating Officer (IO) to discuss the details of your report. The IO will also speak with the student and, if necessary, other affiliated parties. Please keep copies of emails, papers, tests, and any other documentation related to your report.
- Upon completing this initial investigation, the IO will either (a) determine that no violation has occurred or (b) refer the case to a Hearing Board for further review. If the student is found not in violation, then you must treat the student as if no violation has occurred and grade the assignment based solely upon its academic merits. You cannot retaliate against a student if he/she is found not in violation.
B. Appearing before the Hearing Board
- If the case is referred to a Hearing Board, you may be asked to present during an evening hearing. The Board consists of students, faculty members, and the hearing chairperson. Everything reported in the hearing remains confidential and should not be discussed outside of the hearing.
- The Board will complete its review and either (a) determine that no violation has occurred or (b) refer the case to a Hearing Board for further review. If the student is found not in violation, then you must treat the student as if no violation has occurred and grade the assignment based solely upon its academic merits. You cannot retaliate against a student if he/she is found not in violation. If the student is found in violation, then you are free to assign the reduced grade (including a failure in the course) as appropriate. Please note: The sanction of the Board is separate from the academic merit (grade) you choose to assign upon completion of the hearing.
- If the suspected violation occurs when grades are due at the end of the semester, you should assign an "NR" (not reported) as a place holder until the hearing has been completed. Thereafter, you can email the Interim Associate Dean of Academic Affairs (firstname.lastname@example.org) with the final grade.
External Resources for Faculty
The Adjunct Project: "The goal of this website is to identify universities that set the standard for best practices with regard to adjuncts. The best schools should be recognized and honored for what they are doing." This site, created by Josh Boldt, includes self-reported data from adjunct instructors from around the country.
The American Association of University Professors: The Association's purpose is to advance academic freedom and shared governance, to define fundamental professional values and standards for higher education and to ensure higher education's contribution to the common good.
The Chronicle of Higher Education: The Chronicle features news, events, opinion pieces, blogs, facts, figures, forums and career postings in education.
SCS Teaching Guidebook Archive
2011-2012 | 2012-2013
Last updated: 8/25/14